You know, finding a parking space is not easy and when you find it, the next concern will be to find the car and find it intact. Another concern then concerns the fear of having bad encounters; the fear is often justified especially in the ladies who perceive a sense of unease in those silos where the path to find the exit resembles that of a "ghost castle". On the other hand, the news often reports how many robberies, threats, hacking and various violence happen in the parking lots.
Outdoors or in the structure, the car park should guarantee the safety of its customers, but it is undeniable that the fear of having some unwanted encounters, especially in the evening, worries everyone a little.
Ensuring safety in parking areas presents several difficulties, but it is essential to take into consideration the safety of the people who use them as a top priority.
For parking spaces in a newly designed structure this aspect is more considered, creating more controlled and illuminated pedestrian walkways, but in outdoor ones, especially when in large areas, much could and should still be done.
The installation of video surveillance systems with the connection to control units, combined with SOS columns for emergency intervention in case of need are among the priority solutions to make parking safer. Today the most sensitive managers in the protection of their customers CCTV security camera installation connected with control rooms that are able to detect any anomaly in real time.
In recent years, these systems have benefited from a reduction in installation costs. Hardware and software needed as well as an easier possibility of connection and data transmission in even remote places no longer require prohibitive investments.
Lowering costs can allow managers of parking lots of medium or even small areas to create surveillance systems useful to improve safety for motorists.
But the installation of cameras is subject to precise rules dictated by the “Privacy Guarantor " who, ready to sanction any abuse, sometimes creates a deterrent effect towards those who, despite having the characteristics, prefer to avoid any doubt or problem and do not install them.
We believe it useful to report the considerations of a person who is profoundly knowledgeable of the matter as professionally engaged in legal matters pertaining to new technologies.
Video surveillancesecurity camera systems and privacy Video
Surveillance is a tool that has been adapted to date on several occasions, often at the expense of privacy. The Guarantor for the protection of personal data has repeatedly intervened on this topic, often punishing the owners of the video security camera systemsfor failure to comply with the disclosure obligation pursuant to art. 10 of law 675/96. In fact, at the same time as the installation of mobile and fixed cameras, inside and outside environments - and even if functioning for security reasons - the owner must inform the user about the presence of the cameras with appropriate signs.
Activities must observe cautions, constantly following the principle of proportionality between the means used and the ends. Prosecuted.
Primarily all interested parties must determine exactly the purposes pursued through video surveillance and verify their lawfulness according to current regulations (if the activity is carried out in the presence of a concrete danger or for the prevention of specific crimes, it is necessary to respect the skills that the laws assign for these purposes only to certain public administrations, providing that only those administrations can access the information collected).
Secondly, the processing of data must take place according to correctness and for specific, explicit and legitimate purposes, and in cases where the law requires notification to the Guarantor of the processing of personal data carried out by certain subjects, these must indicate among the methods of treatment also the collection of information by means of video surveillance equipment. It is necessary to respect the principles of relevance and non-surplus, collecting only the data strictly necessary for the achievement of the aims pursued, recording only the indispensable images, limiting the visual angle of the shots, avoiding - when not indispensable - detailed, enlarged or detailed images not relevant, and consequently establishing the location of the cameras and the shooting modes.
Related Post: How to get quality night video surveillance images?
It is essential to provide people who may be susceptible to filming with clear, albeit brief, indications that warn of the presence of video surveillance systems.
The data controller must also indicate the period of possible conservation of the images, before their cancellation, and provide for their maintenance only in relation to offenses that have occurred or investigations by the judicial or police authorities.
Another important phase is the designation in writing of persons responsible and in charge of data processing, which have exclusive access to the use of the systems and to the viewing of the records.
It should also be borne in mind that the data collected for certain purposes (security reasons, protection of heritage) cannot be used for different or additional purposes (such as advertising, analysis of consumer behavior) and cannot be disclosed or communicated to third parties ( except for police or justice needs).
Finally, the exact location of the cameras as well as the methods of shooting in accordance with the purposes that suggested the installation of the video surveillance security cameras in Chicago, must take place in compliance with the fundamental principles set by art. 9 law 675/96, especially with regard to the relevance and non-excess of the data with respect to the purposes pursued or the personal data being processed must be: a) processed in a lawful and correct manner; b) collected and recorded for specific, explicit and legitimate purposes, and used in other processing operations in terms not incompatible with these purposes; c) accurate and, if necessary, updated; d) relevant, complete and not in excess of the purposes for which they are collected or subsequently processed; e) kept in a form that allows the Another aspect concerns the preventive adoption of minimum security measures in order to ensure correct use of the data, avoiding the risk that the same may end up in the availability of persons unrelated to the structure or otherwise unauthorized.
In a single case, the Guarantor reiterated - as confirmed by several pronouncements in this regard - that the obligation to adopt the aforementioned precautions should be considered excluded: in fact, if the image taken does not allow a precise representation of the subject concerned, not going in fact to harm any right, it will not be necessary to comply with the above.
